Currently viewing the tag: "legal ruling"
Landlord Details Must Be Included In Prescribed Information

Landlord Details Must Be Included In Prescribed Information

All UK Landlord details should be correct
before being included in Prescribed Information

The information must be included, even when the rental property is fully managed by a managing agent, to avoid any possible legal problems with tenancy deposits.

Linda Howard, of Shoosmiths solicitors has warned that individual judges could make different interpretations on the wording of requirements after the news that a possession order was overturned because the legally required Prescribed Information gave the letting agent’s details instead of the landlords.

She said: “The Housing (Tenancy Deposits) (Prescribed Information) Order (2007) seems to make it clear, at 2, (g) (iii) that the name, address, telephone number and any email address or fax number of the landlord, not the agent, must be given.”

Ms Howard also pointed out that in another case in the county court, a duty solicitor raised exactly the point of an agent’s rather than the landlord’s details being given and the judge subsequently adjourned those proceedings because of seeming non-compliance with the Prescribed Information Order. However, the case went through on the second hearing because the landlord argued that Rules of Agency applied.

Continue reading »

Landlords Must Address Landmark Legal Ruling

Landlords Must Address Landmark Legal Ruling

A UK court case has delivered a landmark ruling that will affect every landlord in the country.
Now any legal notice served on a tenant must have the landlord’s own address on it and not a care of address being that of the agent.

The case of Beitov Properties v Elliston Bentley Martin [2012] UKUT 133 (LC) ruled that a landlord seeking to recover a service charge from a tenant had not complied with the statutory requirements of section 47 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 because the landlord used an indirect address ‘care of’ its managing agents in its demand notice.

The landlord was deemed not to have served a valid demand by using a care of address and the court ruled that the statutory requirements of section 47 of the Landlord and Tenant Act 1987 had been breached so therefore nothing was due from the tenant.

It is common practice for a landlord seeking payment for sums due from a tenant – whether rent, service charge or insurance – to delegate the collection task to managing agents and for the managing agent to be named as the correspondent and recipient of the sum due in payment notices.

The landmark legal case will serve as an important reminder to UK landlords and property managing agents to get ALL the technical details right.

Section 47 of the Landlord & Tenant Act 1987 requires a landlord to give his or her name and address in any written demand to his residential tenants, wether they are comfortable with disclosing it or not.

The Act applies to all UK landlords and their appointed agents.

An individual landlord managing their own properties has to provide their legal residential address, and a company has to provide the address of its legally registered office. Using the letting agent’s or managing agent’s address does not suffice, as it is not the landlord’s legal address.

The implications of the Beitov decision may be more far-reaching than is first apparent. For example, it may not be possible simply to re-serve the demand with a correct address, as the demand could be out of time: service charge demands must be made within 18 months of the liability being incurred.

And of course, many landlords do not like to disclose their addresses to their tenants.

Finally, if a tenant has already paid as a result of a demand that proves defective, they may be able to claw back payments on the basis that they were forced to pay under an invalid demand.

Sim Sekhon, spokesman for Legal 4 Landlords, said: “Property managing agents and landlords need to sit up and take notice of this landmark legal case or face the consequences. If the landlord’s demand notices to tenants are found to be technically defective, they can face consequences paying out up to six years worth of payments if demand notices are not fully compliant with the Landlord & Tenant Act in terms of correct address details.

Landlords are urged to obtain professional advice if they are unsure of any situation regarding the law and Legal 4 Landlords will be happy to help.

Contact Legal 4 Landlords Now : 0844 567 4003

There Will Never Be A Better Time To Invest In Property

MyPropertyPowerTeam.co.uk helps property investors and landlords build their own property power team to enable them to profit from property - Visit our main site now!